Geography school’s curriculum consultation

Many of you will have heard about the school Geography National Curriculum consultation.  Many of you will also have seen calls for professional geographers and others to get involved in these discussions and provide responses.  We thought Ian Cook’s posting to the critical geography forum was so good, we’ve got his permission to post it here.  This consultation is not just for school teachers, not just for the UK, and as Ian says will have real consequences.  Please do get involved.

“For those about to get their university students to address the ‘what is geography?’ question as new academic years start (in many places), please consider using the UK National Curriculum consultation on Geography as a pedagogical resource.

There are some fascinating documents that will enable the edges and nuances in this debate to be drawn out, students can bring to the discussion their own experiences of Geography at school, this is a ‘real’ debate about the identity of the discipline which will have ‘real’ consequences, and students and staff can help to shape these debates online as part of the consultation.

This debate is not just for UK-based geographers. Anyone can take part. One of the key protagonists – whom the UK Government’s Department of Education invited to compile a curriculum document – is Alex Standish, Assistant Professor of Geography at Western Connecticut State University.

The consultation finishes on *30 October*, so there’s a month to go.

The Geographical Association (the subject Association for Geography School teachers in the UK) have assembled a comprehensive range of documents, papers and opportunities for feedback on its web pages:

 To add to this, a few years ago I was involved with Tracey Skelton, Duncan Fuller and Helen Griffiths in ‘Young People’s Geographies’ – a project funded through the RGS/GA ‘Action Plan for Geography’ – which aimed to enliven school geographies and to make them more widely/deeply relevant by encouraging students and their teachers to co-create their Geography curriculum. Project resources which might be used in a ‘What is Geography’ debate include:

From a distance, these discussions may **seem** to range between two ‘extremes’: Standish’s conservative, fact-based rote learning and the YPG’s radical, contingent, co-learning pedagogy. This is a crude simplification of a complex debate, but could be a great place to start off the discussion…

There has been some discussion of the consultation in Twitter, and you can find it via the hashtags: #geographyteacher #geographyriot #Standish &/or #NewGeog

If anyone has used these resources before or can recommend any others, please reply to this post. Finally, whether you do this with your students or not, please read the core documents and contribute to the online discussions on the GA’s website by the end of next month.

Thanks and best wishes

Ian Cook (Exeter)”