Call for papers: New Frontiers of Geographical knowledge and Practice

New frontiers of geographical knowledge and practice? Exploring creative methods and encounter Liz Bondi (Edinburgh), Hester Parr (Glasgow), Olivia Stevenson (Glasgow), Alette Willis (Edinburgh)

1 session slot sponsored by the SCGRG for the RGS-IBG conference, London, Wednesday 28 to Friday 30 August 2013 (with an opening event on Tuesday 27 August 2013)

The aim of this session is to explore and show-case how creative and arts based encounters, acts, ways of knowing and exchanging knowledge are being currently utilised within the discipline of human geography.  The session allows for papers or performances that engage with a range of empirical materials, but with an accent on reflecting upon how geographers are creatively expanding ways of organising and engaging the research encounter and disseminating the knowledges that are accumulated within them. Artistic and theatrical and mediatised techniques, methods and tactics are increasingly common in a discipline which is newly energised to critically deliver its ‘impact’ performatively.

We want to ask: What is at stake here? What and how are these new techniques being utilised as ‘research methods’? How are traditional methodological concerns with inter-subjectivity and empathy being re-cast as a result? In regards to research dissemination and knowledge exchange – how is this creativity constituted and encountered with what intentions and outcomes? How are understandings of ‘research’ and ‘impact’ being challenged?

The session aims to learn from the differing experiences of those using diverse forms of arts based research methods and arts in public and ‘user’ engagement activities.

The call for papers is thus guided by the following question and themes, but not restricted by them:

  • What are creative and arts based research methods and why should they be used in human geography?
  • How can geographical knowledge be performance based and performative and with what effects/affects?
  • What genres are being used in geographical research and with what effects/affects?
  • What happens to ‘safe inter-subjective relations’ in creative and arts based research encounter and dissemination?
  • How does writing geographical research as scripts make a difference?
  • What is the role of the visual in creative research methods and dissemination

Creative and interactive methods of presentation are very welcome.

Further thematic guides:

  • Geography and the creative arts
  • Storying research for social purpose
  • Creative methods and the impact agenda
  • Representing everyday live through arts based approaches
  • Experimental practices
  • Audiencing and production
  • Performance
  • Transformative spaces of learning
  • Creative practice as a pedagogical tool

Please email abstracts of 250 words max to Hester.parr@glasgow.ac.uk by 4th February, 2013.

CFP: Immunitary Geographies

Over the next week, we will be posting the calls for papers and other news on the SCGRG sponsored sessions for the 2012 RGS/IBG conference.  Thank you to everyone who submitted session ideas to us. We are delighted to be sponsoring a range of innovative slots for the summer.

Immunitary Geographies

Organisers: Gail Davies, Jamie Lorimer and Steve Hinchliffe

We invite papers and other provocations exploring immunitary geographies, how biological and social practices, community and immunity, territory and borders, self and non-self are de- and/or re-territorialised through understandings and performances of immunity.

Immunity is receiving increasing attention in social and political theory, biology and geography as well as outside academia. In one sense this suggests a need to interrogate shared metaphors. The correlations between biological framings of immunological responses and the ordering of social lives are well known (Waldby, Haraway, Martin, Napier, Esposito). Martial registers used in fighting disease and defending borders, for example, as well as seemingly more neutral senses of immune system and communicative process, tend to operate through culturally and politically sedimented notions of self and non-self (Napier, 2012). These high-level metaphors can function as premature closures on understanding the complex and embodied practices of immunity across a range of sites (Fischer, 2012). In another sense, there is also a possibility to make use of shared re-investments in the notion of immunity to reconfigure geographies of self and difference. Indeed, alternative ways of thinking about and practising immunology may challenge notions of identity, system and spatial register, and it is here that an immunitary geography could usefully contribute.

Immunitary thinking is active in a range of settings, (we sketch them below), but it is also important to note these scientific paradigms, empirical practices and social theoretical accounts do not always align. By bringing them together in this session we aim to interrogate their geographies and promote not so much a tracing of high-level metaphor, but rather a sense of opportunity for a re-vitalised geography of life.

• Research into immunologically complex phenomena, such as viruses, transplantation, tumour development, pregnancy and regenerative medicine, point to the wider range of immune repertoires and trouble any hard and fast division between self and other. The result may point to more affirmative forms of life politics.

•‘Probiotic’ conceptions of immunity are emerging from citizen science experiments, applying new ideas about health and hygiene to develop practices for tolerating, cultivating and even introducing parasites and symbionts. Likewise, dissatisfaction with anti-biotic modes of urbanism introduces complexity through practices such as shared space planning.

•Security practices, which rely on tropes of resilience, and Lockean preparedness, de- and re-territorialise spaces of home and nation. Here, spatial extension, anticipatory governance and risk management may involve a new kind of warfare, as immunities and exceptions arise from state and nonstate partnerships in emergencies, wars, and disaster management.

•Engagement with hypertrophic security and autoimmunity through the work of Derrida, Esposito and others highlights the paradoxical nature of self-protection.

•Work in geography and elsewhere on hospitality, on hosting and on the requirement to rethink classical political notions of friend and enemy (Dikec et al) starts to unsettle notions of immune response.

We seek to bring together with different ways of understanding immunitary geographies. Our aim is to encourage ongoing and inventive exchange across the different practices, sites, scientific and social theoretical perspectives currently at play in such immunitary geographies, preventing closures around a further series of high-level metaphors.
Some foci include, but are not limited to:

Immunology and security, resilience and risk; Biosecurity and insecurity; Emergencies, accidents, preparedness and immunity; Community and immunity; Political economies of inoculation, vaccine manufacture and administration Immunology; Immunology and the political ecologies of the human microbiome; Discourses and practices of immunology in urban planning; Dirt and mess in children’s geographies; Immunitary bio-economies and bio-resources; The nature of immunosuppression and the geographies of tissue matching; Aesthetic and architectural interventions into immunity; Spatial thinking and immunitary geography; Political immunity and power, and exception; Affirmative biopolitics and thanatopolitics; Studying and tracing immunity; Life as interval, inflexion and the memory of immunity.

Please send an abstract of 250 words to Gail Davies (g.f.davies@exeter.ac.uk), Jamie Lorimer (jamie.lorimer@ouce.ox.ac.uk) and Steve Hinchliffe (Stephen.Hinchliffe@exeter.ac.uk) by Wed 6th Feb 2013.

Call for papers Ambiance and Atmosphere in Translation

Call for papers

Ambiance and Atmosphere in Translation

February 25-27th, 2013, London

Many authors, from the second half of the nineteenth century onwards, have struggled to implement a sensitive approach to urban modernity. How to be attentive to changes in the urban world and the minute variations of the ordinary? From the aesthetic thought of Simmel to Goffman’s ecological approach, the philosophies of everydayness in anthropology, from Laplantine to Kracauer and White, to Wittgenstein, Bégout, and Rancière, work has described, translated and called into question the role of ambiance and atmosphere in the construction of urban life. Coalescing around notions of ambiance or atmosphere, notable research trajectories have interlaced disciplinary concerns within urban studies, cultural geography, sociology and architecture, especially in relation to interconnected concepts such as affect, place, aura, acoustics and ecology. Rarely, however, have these trajectories actually met or collided.

After ‘Ambience and Urban Practices’, and ‘Ambience and Criticism’, this third meeting of the Agence Nationale de la Recherche[1] funded project “Enigmas of contemporary urban mobility”, organized within the framework of the International Ambiances Network, will develop a conversation between ambiance, atmosphere and translation. But how to translate? If translation is understood as a practice of “linguistic hospitality” (Ricoeur, 2004), as an experience of transition and mediation (Wismann, 2012), what form might translation take? How might, in other words, the transition occur between the ‘daily’ word and the word of the ‘expert’, between that of the ‘living’ and that of the ‘foreign’? How to make shareable experiences beyond the singularity expressed in different languages and cultures? What media or combination of media could help us achieve this?

This proposed move is particularly important for more than the usual reasons. Because how can accounts sensitive to the urban emerge from attempts to translate ordinary sensory experience? Or formulated differently, how can the act of making clear and intelligible the experiences, feelings, sensations, of distinct research areas, help forward debates on urban atmospheres/ambiances? Finally, how might a work of translation put our convictions in crisis, to put to test our existing ways of thinking, our relationship to the urban environment, and the plurality of modes of the city-dweller? Amongst the many questions around translation, this seminar intends to practically explore how to “install”, “communicate”, “exhibit” or “express” ambiances and atmospheres.

 As part of this event, confirmed ‘Observers’ include: Kyran Joughin (University of the Arts, London), Derek McCormack (Oxford University), Jean-Paul Thibaud (Cresson, ENSAG, Grenoble).

 Instructions

Abstracts should be drafted in English and not exceed 300 words. Along with a title and 4-5 keywords, these should be sent to peter.adey@rhul.ac.uk, p.simpson@keele.ac.uk and damien.masson@u-cergy.fr, rachel.thomas@grenoble.archi.fr by January 11th, 2013 at the latest.

Authors will be notified of the acceptance of their paper by January 21st, 2013 at the latest.

 A publication of articles stemming from the conference papers is envisaged, in English, under the shape of a book or a special issue of the new journal Ambiances.

 Organizers of the seminar: Peter Adey (Royal Holloway, University of London), Paul Simpson (Keele University), Damien Masson (Université de Cergy-Pontoise, Laboratoire MRTE, Chercheur associé au Cresson), Rachel Thomas (Chargée de recherche au CNRS, Directrice du Cresson, Coordinatrice de la recherche ANR MUSE)

Date of the seminar: February 25-27th, 2013, University of London, Senate House and 11 Bedford Square, Bloomsbury, London.

The conference is free, but participants will be responsible for their own accommodation, transport and evening meal.

 Language of the seminar: English


[1] Project number: ANR-10-ESVS-013-01. ANR research agency is mainly funding this seminar.

Dissertation Prize 2012 Winners

We are delighted to announce the winner for the 2012 Dissertation Prize, Chris Goodman, University of Oxford, and the Runner Up, Nicholas Speechley, Loughborough University. Full details here.

Overall the standard of competition was extremely high this year, and the Committee felt that the winner and runner-up showcased the best work being produced by young social and cultural geographers in the UK.

 

Closing thoughts and thanks

This is my last post as Chair of the Social and Cultural Geography Research Group, so I hope you will excuse the indulgence of some closing reflections and heartfelt thanks.

I have been involved in the group as secretary and then chair for six very enjoyable years. The SCGRG has been a pleasure to work with.  The committee has always been excellent and supportive.  I can’t name everyone here, but over 6 years there are many people who have helped organise events, set up and run up the dissertation prize, welcome new members to the group and keep finances, communications and conference administration on track. I am grateful to you all and have learnt so much from you.  I would also like to acknowledge the enormous input and continued support from the RGS-IBG, particularly from Catherine Souch, Stephanie Wyse and Joy Hayward in the Research and Higher Education Division.

The wider group has also been an inspiration too. It has considerable strengths through its size and diversity, which can be seen as challenges, but enthusiasm has always been able to turn these into opportunities for dialogue and debate.  This dynamism is important and I hope it will continue.  There are new challenges too.  The group is beginning to explore the implications of the changing environment in higher education, with more demands and less funding, through sessions at this year’s RGS-IBG annual conference on ‘crisis’ and ‘impact’.  I think discussion needs to continue in the group as well about how best to support researchers in social and cultural geography in potentially difficult times. The new committee will be reviewing this shortly, so do get in touch with ideas.

So finally, I’d like to welcome the new committee. I am delighted to be handing on to an excellent group including Pete Adey as Chair, Sarah Mills as Secretary, Chris Bear as Treasurer, Franklin Ginn as Dissertation Co-ordinator, James Ash as Communications Office,  Rebecca Sandover and Mia Hunt as postgraduate representatives, and Amanda Rogers, Harriet Hawkins, Owain Jones, Hannah Macpherson, Tara Woodyer, Paul Simpson and Leila Dawney. Full details will be on the committee webpage soon.  And a final plug.  I’m not totally giving up responsibilities for social and cultural geography.  Stepping down from this role means I have the time to take up editing the Cultural Geography section of Geography Compass. If you have ideas for innovative reviews and overlooked subjects in cultural geography I’d love to hear from you!

With thanks and best wishes

Gail Davies

SCGRG AGM Agenda

RGS-IBG Social and Cultural Geography Research Group AGM

Tuesday 2nd July 2012, RGS Edinburgh, Room TRH-COM

Agenda for the meeting

  1. Apologies for absence
  2. Chair’s report
  3. Treasurer’s Report
  4. Changes in Committee Membership:
    • Election of New Chair
    • Election of New Secretary
    • Confirm Election of Acting Treasurer to Treasurer
    • Other committee members, including election of new dissertation co-ordinator, proposed re-election of postgraduate representatives, any further roles (membership secretary, communications secretary) and ordinary members
  5. Undergraduate Dissertation Prize
  6. Proposed research group activities
  7. Allocating Group funds to support non-committee proposed research activities
  8. Proposal from Robert Rojek (sage)
  9. AOB
  10. Key dates from RGS:
    • a) Research Group Grants – deadlines Oct 31st
    • b) Annual Report due 31st January 2013
    • c) Next RGS-IBG annual conference Wednesday 28 to Friday 30 August 2013. The conference Chair will be Jonathan Rigg (Durham) and the theme ‘New Geographical Frontiers’.
    • Key dates for the research group are: i) October 2012 Call for Papers ii) End of February 2013 deadline for Research Group sessions
  11. Date of next meeting sometime 28-30 August 2013

Annual General Meeting

Dear All,

The next Social and Cultural Geography Research Group AGM will be at 7.30pm on Tuesday 3rd of July.  The meeting will be in a venue during the RGS annual conference. Details of the venue will be published in the programme and posted here when available.

We are hoping to make lots of new appointments to the committee at this meeting, so please do come along to find out more about the opportunities  in the group and offer your support for those interested in these roles.  There is more information on these new opportunities in a previous post.

 

with best wishes

Gail Davies, Chair

 

Programme for AC2012

The provisional programme for the RGS annual conference 2012 in Edinburgh has now been posted online.  Keep a look out for the following SCGRG sponsored sessions:

Tuesday 3rd July 2012

Wednesday 4th July 2012

Thursday 5th July 2012

The SCGRG AGM will be on Tuesday 3rd July at 7.30pm. All are welcome to attend.

Social and Cultural Geographies of Impact

We are delighted to confirm the line up for two innovative sessions the SCGRG is running on ‘Social and Cultural Geographies of Impact’ at the RGS annual conference Edinburgh 3-5th July 2012.

Sarah Mills, Chris Bear, Amanda Rogers, Rebecca Sandover and Mia Hunt have put together two fantastic sessions which aim to unpack and expand understandings and conceptualizations of impact, generating discussion and debate. These will both run on the Thursday afternoon during the conference.

The first session will host very short, critical ‘impact statements’ (short papers or think pieces) from a range of academic and non-academic participants at AC2012.   We now have a final line up of contributors.  We are delighted to welcome the following people who will be helping us navigate the landscape of ‘impactful’ geographies in higher education and research institutions.

  • Rachel Pain  Impact: a masterful blow or walking hand in hand?
  • Anna Carlsson-Hyslop What is the impact of histories and geographies of science?
  • Katriona Carmichael Outcomes: A view from Scottish Government
  • Catherine Souch/Rita Gardner  Impact and the RGS
  • Jonathan Mendel How bad research might achieve strong REF impact
  • Richard Phillips A Place for Curiosity in the Age of Impact?
  • James Kneale Accidental Impact
  • Jennifer Turner Impact for postgraduates: in search of the Holy Grail?
  • Lakhbir Jassal Deadly Impact: The Construction of Expertise and Responsibility
  • Ruth Wolstenholme Brokering knowledge for a broad audience
  • Penny Woolnough Policing Research and the Geographies of Missing People
  • Hannah Macpherson The Work of Disabled Artists and its Potential ‘Impact’
  • Jenny Pickerill Impacting who, when, and for whose gain?
  • Deirdre Conlon Reflections on the politics of ‘retaking impact proposals’
  • Lucy Veale The AHRC Landscape and Environment ProgrammeDirector’s Impact Fellowship
  • Ian Cook, et al. Making is connecting: followthethings.com’s shopping bags

The second session will develop discussion from these statements, exploring the ‘impact of impact’ through a series of postcard prompt questions.  Small group discussions will tackle such questions as: What is ‘impact’?  How do we evidence ‘impact’?  How do those outside the academy understand ‘impact’?  What are the stakes of ‘impact’ for postgraduates? Please bring along your questions concerns and comments.

Social and Cultural Geography Benchmarking

Dear Colleagues:

Thanks to those of you who were able to respond to my earlier request for information regarding the ESRC’s current ‘benchmarking review’ of UK human geography, chaired by Professor David Ley at UBC and being undertaken in partnership with the AHRC and RGS-IBG.

I was commissioned to provide an overview of social and cultural geography, covering the last ten years and seeking to answer the following three questions:

  1. How has research in social and cultural geography in the UK developed over the last ten years, and what are the major strengths and weaknesses of the field?
  2. How does UK research in social and cultural geography compare with research produced by colleagues in other countries?
  3. Can you suggest some examples of key academic outputs by UK scholars (books and other publications) that have made an important contribution to scholarship and/or have helped to set or move intellectual agendas in the field?

My draft report is attached here, with an invitation to provide any further comment by Monday 12 March.  The final report has to be submitted on 19 March

Please send your comments and suggestions to: p.a.jackson@sheffield.ac.uk

Your help will be very much appreciated and will contribute directly to the review process.

 

Thanks and best wishes

Peter Jackson